Pentagon Should Increase Testing for Weapons, Warfighting Capabilities: Report

A nonpartisan authorities watchdog is asking on the Division of Protection to replace its testing insurance policies so U.S. troops can purchase weapons at a faster scale.

The Authorities Accountability Workplace (GAO), an impartial authorities company, revealed a brand new report on Thursday highlighting gaps in present weapons acquisitions. It encourages DoD to undertake 13 suggestions to higher equip the army whereas elevating testing and evaluating capabilities for modernization.

The GAO evaluation, revealed as a part of a 65-page report, analyzed DoD-wide insurance policies and “discovered they weren’t totally in keeping with chosen main practices for product growth as utilized to check and analysis: contain testers early, conduct iterative testing, use digital twins and threads, and procure consumer suggestions iteratively.”

Suggestions are being prompt because the Pentagon has pushed its personal requirements in direction of modernized techniques that features a larger emphasis on synthetic intelligence and never lagging behind international adversaries within the ongoing race for technological development. Broader DoD plans ought to be met with rigorous requirements, per the GAO.

“We relied on DoD’s particular person check and evaluation-related organizations to outline modernization within the context of how they’ve outlined their organizations’ future wants. … Collectively, these modernization plans recognized a necessity for DoD to situation new or revised insurance policies and steerage to assist modernized check and analysis,” Shelby Oakley, director of contracting and nationwide safety acquisitions on the GAO, advised Army.com.

“Our subsequent overview of those check and evaluation-related insurance policies, together with ones on the DoD-wide and particular person army division ranges, substantiated this want for coverage modifications,” she added.

Sailors assigned to the Wasp-class amphibious assault ship USS Boxer (LHD 4) conduct small arms security coaching, Nov. 11, 2025. (U.S. Navy picture by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Eliora Sims)

GAO Suggestions

Of the GAO’s 13 complete suggestions issued to the protection secretary and the secretaries of the Air Pressure, Army, and Navy, the DoD concurred with seven suggestions, partially concurred with 5 suggestions, and didn’t concur with one suggestion.

The Navy was the one department to not concur on a suggestion for check plans to include “finish consumer agreements that element a course of for acquiring ongoing consumer enter and suggestions.”

One merchandise flagged within the report is the Air Pressure’s T-7A Crimson Hawk, which is anticipated to switch the legacy T-38C coach fleet. Nevertheless, Air Pressure officers per the report have had issue accessing such knowledge in a well timed method—along with challenges transferring giant information as a result of cybersecurity necessities.

Bettering Warfighting Capabilities

The GAO carried out three web site visits to the Air Pressure Take a look at Heart (AFTC), Army Take a look at and Analysis Command (ATEC), and Navy Operational Take a look at and Analysis Pressure (OPTEVFOR), particularly chosen as a result of being main check businesses at every of the army departments. Additionally they have centrally positioned workforces to satisfy with check officers and higher perceive modeling, simulation and stay digital constructive environments.

The report says that “DOD has but to understand its aim” in quickly growing weapon techniques due partially to check and evaluating challenges, resulting in delays in growth that negatively affect the timeline for weapons to achieve troops’ fingers.

This has been a degree of emphasis in Washington, notably within the new Nationwide Protection Authorization Act that handed the Home of Representatives earlier this week. The timing of the report’s launch isn’t associated to the NDAA.

The GAO report exhibits variations in present DoD testing and analysis insurance policies. (GAO)

GAO reported in its findings that DoD’s digital engineering coverage, together with its check and analysis part of DoD’s techniques engineering coverage, “don’t describe particular processes to make sure software of main practices to testing.” It additionally found that army department-level check and analysis insurance policies “usually didn’t mirror the main practices past the extent present in DoD-wide insurance policies.”

Key program paperwork, like acquisition methods and check methods for chosen weapon techniques acquisition applications it reviewed, weren’t correctly mirrored.

“Our report recognized gaps between DoD insurance policies and main practices in the right way to develop, check, and consider weapon techniques such that they’re related and conscious of warfighter wants,” Oakley mentioned. “Warfighter wants are mission-dependent, however usually embrace issues like schedule for supply, functionality effectiveness and lethality, and suitability components resembling reliability, maintainability, and security of the operator.”

Not a New Level of Emphasis

The problems conveyed within the report which are resulting in the GAO recommendations are nothing new. In reality, they’ve been round for many years.

Oakley mentioned that DoD weapons techniques acquisition has been a part of the GAO’s high-risk record courting again to 1990.

U.S. Air Pressure Senior Airman Bryce Baugham, 57th Upkeep Group load crew member, inspects a missile earlier than loading it onto an A-10 Thunderbolt II assigned to the 66th Weapons Squadron in the course of the third quarter weapons standardization load crew competitors at Nellis Air Pressure Base, Nevada, Oct. 3, 2025. (U.S. Air Pressure picture by Airman 1st Class Heather Amador)

“The issues going through this situation space, together with weapon system check and analysis particularly, are long-standing and have persevered by way of quite a few administrations over the previous 35 years,” she mentioned. “We didn’t evaluate insurance policies throughout administrations nor did that facet issue into our report.”

For instance, in June of this 12 months, GAO discovered that the DoD’s anticipated time-frame to ship preliminary capabilities for 79 of its main protection acquisition applications averaged about 12 years—longer than the typical time-frame of 10 years for 82 applications recognized in Might 2019.

“We’ve got undertaken a physique of labor and issued reviews since 2022 documenting the practices that main product growth corporations depend on to efficiently develop, check, combine, produce and assist modern merchandise that fulfill the wants of their clients and customers,” Oakley mentioned. “This work has offered a roadmap that we’ve inspired DoD to make use of to restructure its insurance policies and processes for weapon system acquisitions.”

Oakley added that the GAO seems ahead to implementing the DoD’s November 2025 memorandum to remodel the nation’s protection acquisition system into the warfighting acquisition system, in addition to its implementation of the report’s suggestions.

Story Continues

Comments

comments