The Secrets and techniques of Russia’s Artillery Warfare in Ukraine

A report revealed by the UK-based Royal United Companies Institute (RUSI) assume tank reveals fascinating new particulars on Russian artillery ways gleaned from in-person interviews of Ukrainian troopers by army analysts Jack Watling and Nick Reynolds.

Whereas the report deserves studying in full right here, the article highlights key findings concerning Russia’s artillery-based means of struggle.

It’s no secret that after Russia’s bold early assaults met with catastrophe in February-March, beginning in April Russia pivoted to an artillery-oriented fashion of attrition warfare in Jap Ukraine, battering Ukrainian models with overwhelming shelling.

Watling observes: “The widely mediocre efficiency of Russia’s floor forces has been more and more offset by their leveraging of massed artillery fires to facilitate a sluggish and methodical advance. Sustained bombardment has progressively displaced the native inhabitants and levelled the settlements and infrastructure that have been being defended, forcing the Ukrainian army to desert territory after it’s devastated.

Large bombardments progressively dislodged Ukrainian troops from the symbolically necessary cities of Severodonetsk and Lyschansk by the top of June, whereas making it inconceivable for Ukrainian forces to pay attention with sufficient velocity and numbers to successfully counterattack. Much more ominously, Watling estimates Ukrainian personnel losses could now be approaching parity with Russia’s.

The silver lining is that Ukrainian models have repeatedly averted encirclement and annihilation—a part of Moscow’s unique targets in Donbas—by way of well timed and comparatively orderly withdrawals, and really gained floor round Kherson in southern Ukraine.

Russian artillery has an over 3:1 firepower benefit

Russia doesn’t even have an enormous quantitative benefit in fight troops in comparison with Ukraine (as a result of it’s not absolutely mobilized)—however it does have rather more artillery, and is producing much more artillery fires.

In response to the report, Russian howitzers are expending 20,000 shells every day on common, in comparison with 6,000 fired by Ukraine. The ratio for rocket artillery and ballistic missiles launches is even worse. And Ukraine nonetheless dangers exhausting its provide of Soviet-standard 152-millimeter shells even quicker than Russia does.

Russian artillery stays extra centralized than anticipated.

Russia’s army was thought to have decentralized a lot artillery into its key tactical unit, the tank or infantry battalion tactical group (BTG), thought to combine a robust (and theoretically extra responsive) complement of 1-3 artillery batteries.

However in response to the examine, BTGs in follow usually have solely a modest variety of mortars and older howitzers. As an alternative, brigade- and divisional command echelons jealously retain management of extra fashionable artillery belongings in centralized ‘artillery tactical teams.’

Moreover, artillery in BTGs has been saddled with shockingly poor communications structure, compelling models to confirm hearth missions by way of un-encrypted civilian cell telephones, leading to a ponderous ‘kill-chain’.

The end result, per the report: “…Russian artillery has largely operated independently from – reasonably than in shut help of—its maneuver parts [ie. tanks and infantry], with supportive hearth missions having lengthy delays.”

Russian Artillery Firing. Picture Credit score: Artistic Commons.

Russian artillery turns into a lot simpler when linked to drones.

Previous to 2022, Russia’s army was perceived to have developed a Western-style “reconnaissance-fires complicated” the place ahead drone surveillance belongings (particularly Orlan-10 surveillance drones) might cue in exact and well timed strikes, aided by digital hearth path/battle administration methods.

This was not in proof within the struggle’s early days because of rushed struggle preparations, however since then it’s clear Russia typically can implement this doctrine and ship lethal precision assaults—it’s simply not a widespread functionality, because of shortages of adequately skilled personnel and {hardware}, notably communications methods and drones.

For instance, when supported by drones, Russian artillery can regulate fires in actual time to hit shifting targets. Drone spotters additionally allow the deployment of small sub-units of only one or two weapons to ship efficient strikes, reasonably than absolutely batteries of six weapons.

However a scarcity of proficient personnel and {hardware} (notably the bigger Orlan-30 drone, which has a laser designator) has resulted in Russian models losing provides of laser-guided Krasnopol rounds in unguided barrages.

Russia assigns totally different roles to several types of artillery.

In response to Watling, whereas Russia employs howitzers for attacking discrete level targets, multiple-rocket launcher methods are sometimes used to bar the motion of Ukrainian forces by laying down a curtain of destruction in between them and their desired goal.

Counter-battery assaults focusing on Ukrainian artillery, in addition to Ukrainian drone operators, are the protect of Tochka-U ballistic missiles and Russia’s longest-range weapons managed on the divisional degree: the 2A65 Msta and 2A36 Giatsint towed-howitzers, their 2S19 and 2S5 self-propelled variants, and the 2S7M Malka 203-millimeter self-propelled howitzer.

2S7 Malka

2S7 Malka. Picture Credit score: Artistic Commons.

Right here’s how Russian artillery deploys

Ukrainian sources declare Russian artillery models usually deploy roughly one-third of their most firing vary again from the frontline to insulate in opposition to enemy assaults.

Watling writes that “…mortars are largely positioned 1.5 km [1 mile] again from the ahead line of personal troops, artillery tactical teams subordinated to brigades 8 km [5 miles] again, and artillery tactical teams armed with longer-ranged methods devoted to deep fires at 10–15 km [6-9 miles] again.”

Howitzer models normally deploy in a 100×300 meter space, with 20-40 meters between weapons. Rocket-launcher models as a substitute use a linear formation, with as much as 150-meters separating every launcher truck.

The report additionally describes Russian models deploying ‘dummy’ artillery batteries of largely broken/destroyed weapons to divert and soak up Ukrainian strikes.

Russia’s counter-battery sport is sluggish—besides when aided by drones.

Counter-battery artillery seeks to take out an opponent’s artillery, leveraging radars and acoustic sensors to hint incoming shellfire again to its level of origin. The quicker that may be completed, the extra seemingly counter-battery hearth will catch the attacking battery earlier than it may relocate.

However in response to Watling & Reynolds, Russian counter-battery is sluggish, normally averaging half-hour to launch a counter-battery strike. That’s greater than sufficient time for even towed artillery to fireplace, hitch as much as vehicles and get the hell out of dodge.

However when networked with a drone spotter, Russian weapons can execute correct counter-battery strikes in simply 3-5 minutes. Solely Ukraine’s most fashionable, Western-supplied cell artillery methods can shoot-and-scoot quick sufficient to keep away from that. Because of this, Ukrainian artillery batteries frequently deploy transportable air protection missiles—ideally optically-guided Starstreak/Marlet missiles—to shoot down drones.

Watling notes Russia has made surprisingly in depth, even wasteful, use of Tochka-U ballistic missiles for counter-battery strikes, noting an incident when three of those highly effective however imprecise weapons have been fired at a single Ukrainian M109 Paladin self-propelled howitzer—inflicting solely mild injury.


Tochka missile system. Picture Credit score: Artistic Commons.

Russian artillery doesn’t shoot-and-scoot.

Whereas the report notes Ukrainian models report can “persistently evade” Russian counter-battery hearth (no less than when drones aren’t round), Russian artillery crews largely didn’t transfer after firing—displacing solely after having come underneath assault, ie. ‘take hearth and then scoot.”

Ukrainian sources additionally declare Russian howitzers crews, when coming underneath shellfire, usually abandon their weapons to hunt cowl—even when vehicle-mounted.

Ammunition provide is Russia’s Achille’s heel

Russia’s employment of artillery could lack finesse by Western requirements, however it nonetheless has had a dominant function in facilitating the seize of key targets and inflicted unsupportable casualties. How you can sort out such a broadly damaging, if clumsy, behemoth?

Watling argues the secret is to starve the beast, ie. “…the logistics burden posed by the transportation and stockpiling of the huge amount of shells that permits Russia to proceed to maneuver by hearth.”

That’s as a result of Moscow’s floor forces are infamously depending on rail logistics to provide forces in comparison with Western armies, missing sufficient vehicles and fashionable palletized load-lifting gear.

Watling writes: “…ammunitions dumps on the divisional and brigade degree are giant, distinct, laborious to hide or defend, and sluggish to relocate…given the disparity in weapons and the scarcity of Russian precision fires, the quickest option to degree the enjoying subject is to allow Ukraine to strike Russian artillery logistics.”

Whereas the report argues Ukraine has didn’t systematically exploit this weak point, this arguably has modified, given a shocking succession of precision assaults on Russian ammunition depots deep behind the frontline in July.

These are made attainable by Ukraine’s use of Western-supplied HIMARS and M270 rocket artillery methods, which may exactly assault targets practically 50 miles away utilizing GPS-guided rockets.

Such strikes might hamstring Russia’s artillery struggle, however solely as long as Ukraine receives sufficient HIMARS/M270s and long-range Western howitzers shortly sufficient, and if NATO states adequately enhance manufacturing of 155-millimeter shells in order to maintain deliveries to Ukraine. He additionally advocates the West streamlining the variety of artillery sorts delivered to Ukraine to simplify the ensuing “logistical nightmare” for Ukraine’s army, however that appears unlikely to occur given the distributed nature of Western support to Ukraine.

Sébastien Roblin writes on the technical, historic, and political facets of worldwide safety and battle for publications together with The Nationwide CuriosityNBC, Warfare is Boring and 19FortyFive, the place he’s Protection-in-Depth editor.  He holds a Grasp’s diploma from Georgetown College and served with the Peace Corps in China.  You possibly can observe his articles on Twitter.

Supply hyperlink